Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Sandeep Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter as the “Code”) [now Section 483(3) read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter as the “BNSS”)] has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of bail, which was granted to the respondent no. 2 by learned Additional Sessions Judge-06, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, Delhi (hereinafter as the “ASJ”) vide order dated 11th January, 2023.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the petitioner, are that on 26th June, 2022, the petitioner was forcefully apprehended from his house on gun point by respondent no. 2, who is an accused in the aforesaid FIR. It is stated that the petitioner was beaten mercilessly by the respondent no. 2 and his associates, demanding a ransom of Rs. 1,00,000/-, which was arranged by the petitioner and duly transferred to the respondent no. 2’s account.
3. It is stated that the petitioner was taken onto a building’s terrace and was allegedly tied to a cot, when the father of the respondent no. 2, who is also an accused in the instant FIR, came to the spo
Bail should not be cancelled without supervening circumstances or violation of bail conditions, emphasizing the need for a reasoned approach in such matters.
Bail should not be cancelled without supervening circumstances or breach of bail conditions, emphasizing the need for specific allegations against the accused.
The court emphasized that the power to cancel bail demands overwhelming proof of changed circumstances or misuse of bail, maintaining that courts must be slow to intervene in bail decisions.
Bail may be canceled when an accused violates conditions, especially if such violations threaten the integrity of a fair trial, as established by precedents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the misuse of bail and the legal principles governing the cancellation of bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for supervening circumstances and overwhelming reasons for the cancellation of bail, as outlined in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State ....
Valid and substantiated allegations are required to justify the cancellation of bail, and compliance with bail conditions can be a relevant factor in such decisions.
Cancellation of bail requires substantial evidence of misuse or supervening circumstances; mere allegations without corroboration are insufficient.
Cancellation of bail should be treated differently from a bail application and should only be cancelled if strong and compelling reasons exist, as established by legal precedents and guidelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
