Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.M.NAYAR, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar – Respondent
ORDER
M.S.A. Siddiqui, J.
1. The facts material for the purpose of disposal of this Letters Patent Appeal filed against the order dated 13th May, 1998 passed by the learned Single Judge are shortly as follows:
2. On 27th May, 1986, the respondent was enrolled in the Indian Air-force as a Technical Trade Airmen. Thereafter, the respondent underwent training courses and on 27th May, 1991 he was promoted to the substantive rank of Corporal. It appears that the respondent developed some psychotic problem. On 30th October, 1995 the respondent's invalidment Medical Board was constituted which found him unfit for further service on account of the psychotic illness. The opinion of the Medical Board was approved by Air Head-quarters on 11.12.1995 and by the order dated 8.1.1996 the respondent was discharged from the service. The respondent filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging validity of the impugned order of discharge. The respondent denied the appellant's case and alleged that the respondent was invalided from service on account of the disability which was not attributable to/or aggravated by the air-force service. By the order dated 13th May, 19
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
