Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
A.K.SIKRI, VIPIN SANGHI
Abu Basar – Appellant
Versus
Railway Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
1. Petitioner has, by way of this petition, impugned the order dated 30.5.2003 passed by the Principal Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal for short) in O.A. No.2072/2002 whereby the original application filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in North-East Railway division with Respondent No.3 on 16.7.1962 as apprentice mechanical. He was promoted to the post of Charge man w.e.f. 22.7.1964. Petitioner continued to work there till 29.4.1977. Pursuant to advertisement dated 2.4.1976 issued by Respondent No.4 (NCERT)advertising the vacancy to the post of Technical Officer, the petitioner applied for the said post. Petitioner states that his application for the said post was routed through proper channel. On his selection the petitioner resigned from his services with Railways on 18.1.1977 citing personal reasons as the cause for such resignation. As per petitioner, instead of seeking permission to join the NCERT he tendered his resignation in accordance with the advise received by him from the Senior officials, with a view to save time and formalities, since he had to j
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
