SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MADAN B.LOKUR, S.MURALIDHAR
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Mohan Foundation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Muralidhar, J.

1. These two cases are references made to this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`Tribunal') Delhi Bench "E", New Delhi under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (`Act'). The questions referred for two Assessment Years are more or less similar. Relevant to the Assessment Year 1976-77, the following questions of law have been referred for our opinion in ITA No. 2601/Del/1979:

    1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that 5,06,076 shares being bonus shares of M/s. Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd ('MMBL'). Received by the assessee did not represent funds of the trust invested in the said concern for purposes of section 13(4) of the Act?

    2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the prohibited category of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) did not have substantial interest in MMBL in which the funds of the assessee were invested and, therefore, the provisions of section 13(2)(h) were not applicable?

    3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the trust was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top