SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, MOOL CHAND GARG
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Jagmohan Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pradeep Nandrajog, J. (Oral)

1. At the outset it may be recorded that Ashok Kumar, the respondent in W.P.(C) No.3992/2008, whose identity has been established with reference to the ID card issued by the Election Commission of India (photocopy whereof is taken on record under his signatures) as also the PAN card issued by the Government of India (photocopy whereof is taken on record under his signatures) states that notwithstanding he having won the battle against the petitioner before the Central Administrative Tribunal, his consent be recorded that he withdraws his claim and thus we proceed to declare that as regards Ashok Kumar, the petitioner stands relieved from the rigours of the impugned order dated 09.07.2007 allowing O.A. No.1829/2006.

2. The issue raised has thus to be considered vis-`-vis Jag Mohan Sharma, the respondent in W.P.(C) NO.3991/2008.

3. Jag Mohan Sharma sought a declaration that the action of the writ petitioner in reverting him from the post of Tech II to the post of Tech III with effect from 01.02.2006 and withdrawing the benefit of pay and salary was illegal, if for no other reason, the denial of hearing inasmuch as having promoted him in gra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top