SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJIV KHANNA
M.L. Meena – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER

1. I have examined the report/order sheet of the vigilance section relied upon by the counsel for the petitioner. The report/order sheet was probably prepared in the year 1996. The report states that a complaint was received from one Mr. R.K. Singh of Noida, making allegations that the complainant-petitioner herein, while working as ADG, G.M.S.D., Delhi, had favoured one Mr. Hans Raj and his company/associates and had made purchases at higher costs without issuing tender inquiries.

2. The report/order sheet records the allegations in the complaint as under:

    1. "Shri Meena favours one Mr. Hansraj and his companies/associates e.g. he is promoting the interest of firm M/s Harjeet Enterprises, which is distributor of companies of Mr. Hansraj, Shri. Meena purchases bracketed items for CGHS at higher costs without issuing tender inquiries. He is purchasing product of his favour i.e. companies (e.g. Richimol, Richimox) by misrepresenting the facts.

    2. He is passing the current bills of his favourite companies where bill worth Rs. 25 crores are pending in the depot.

    3. The stores of favorite parties of Shri. Meena are being issued first so as to go more order in their favour.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top