SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Vimal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Negi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

1. Contempt is averred of the order dated 11th November, 2009 of this Court on an application of the petitioner / relator under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 directing the alleged contemnor to pay to the petitioner / relator from the date of the award and till the decision of the writ petition, last drawn wages or minimum wages whichever is higher and on the other terms and conditions stipulated in the order. It is the case of the petitioner that the alleged contemnors are in violation of the said order.

2. The petition came up first before this Court on 10th March, 2011 when attention of the counsel for the petitioner/relator was invited to an order dated 17th January, 2011 of this Bench in Cont.Cas(C) 26/2011 titled Nishikesh Tyagi v. Sh. P.R. Santhanam holding a contempt petition to be not maintainable with respect to an order under Section 17B of the ID Act. Reliance in the said order was placed on another judgment of this Court in Uma Shankar v. M/s Hindustan Carbide Pvt. Ltd. 111(2004) DLT 270 where also a contempt petition filed for the alleged violation of order under Section 17B was dismissed. The counsel for the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top