SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
INDERMEET KAUR
Chhidi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ramjas Foundation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Indermeet Kaur, J. (Oral)

1. This appeal has impugned and judgment dated 25.9.2006 which had endorsed the finding of the trial judge dated 01.12.1995 whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff Ramjsas Foundation seeking possession and recovery of damages qua the suit property i.e. Jhuggi No.F-35, Sari Rohilla, anand Parbat, New Delhi ( hereinafter referred to as 'the suit property') had been decreed in faovur of the plaintiff.

2. The case of the plaintiff as is evident from the plaint is that the plaintiff is the owner of the suit property. The defendant was a licencee therein. License deed dated 31.12.1979 (Ex.,PW-1/6) had been executed between the parties. Defendant is unauthorisedly occupying the suit property. In para 5 of the plaint, it has been specifically averred that the licence of the defendant was terminated on 07.3.1985 vide a written notice. In spite of the said termination the defendant had failed to vacate the suit property.

3. In the written statement, it was denied that the licence has been terminated in terms of the aforenoted notice. It was stated that up to date licence fee had been paid by the defendant; no cause of action has arisen in favour of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top