SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Sainath Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. By this application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:

    "a) injunction directing the Respondents to continue to permit the petitioner to execute the project work on the same terms and conditions/or subject to any other appropriate terms and conditions and keep the letters dated 26/27-03-2009 in abeyance during the arbitral proceedings;

    b) Direct the Respondents to honour the bills dated 24-03-2009 raised by the petitioner as provisional payment against the work already done and materials procured by the petitioner;

    c) In the alternative that prayer (a) is not granted or not being continued in due course, permit the petitioner to take inventory of the material and resources at the sites;

    d) Pass an order restraining respondents from encashing bank guarantees submitted by the petitioner in respect of, in relation to and concerning the aforementioned four contract."

2. The brief facts relevant for purpose of deciding this petition are that the petitioner was awarded a contract for construction of dwelling units for army personnel at various sites in Pune city. This contract between the petitioner and the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top