Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
A.K.SIKRI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board – Appellant
Versus
Preeti Rathi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. Sikri, ACJ.
1. The petition impugns the order dated 20th August, 2010 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi allowing the Original Application No.714/2009 filed by the respondents and whereby the petitioners were directed to declare the result of the examination for the post of Primary Teachers taken by the respondents and to also grant age relaxation to the respondents, as accorded to certain others and to, if successful in the examination, offer appointment to the respondents as Primary Teachers within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.
2. The factual matrix leading to the aforesaid decision is as under. The respondents no.1 to 2, in the year 2001 were appointed as Primary Teachers in MCD on contract basis. They had passed the qualifying examination of Elementary Teachers Education (ETE) diploma course of two years of the State Council of Educational Research & Training. The age limit for doing the said course was 17-30 years. As per the then recruitment rules of MCD, the age limit prescribed for employment as Primary Teacher was 32 years for males and 42 years for females.
3. The respondents
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
