SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANIL KUMAR, SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
Bansi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anil Kumar, J.

1. The petitioner, a Head Constable at the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), has challenged the order of dismissal dated 2nd May, 1997 passed by the Inspector General, CRPF, on the charge that he had submitted a false certificate of his date of birth and he had changed his date of birth as he was not eligible for the post of Constable at the time of his enlistment, and the order dated 16th January, 1998 passed by the Director General dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the enhancement of punishment imposed on him.

2. Brief relevant facts to comprehend the controversies are that the petitioner joined the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) on 27th April, 1968. At the time of joining he had submitted his date of birth certificate verified by the concerned authority, in accordance with Rule 14 of the CRPF Rules, 1955 and the Verification Roll No. 1225 dated 29th May, 1968, was received on 16th July, 1968.

3. On 16th March, 1995 a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner leveling the following allegations against him:

    "That the said number 680332976 HC Bansi Ram of E/52 Bn., CRPF while functioning as Head Constable in 52 Bn., CRPF committed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top