SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI
Malhotra Book Depot – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J. (Oral)--This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek a writ of mandamus against the respondents thereby directing them to grant restoration and/or renewal of the petitioners trademark registration No.268211B dated 23.11.1970 in Class 16.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner obtained the registration of the stylized mark MBD under Registration No.268211B on 23.11.1970 vide certificate dated 20.12.1971 issued by the Registrar of Trademarks. This registration was lastly renewed on 01.07.1977, and expired on 23.11.1984.

3. The petitioner submits that the said registration was not renewed, and the petitioner came to know of the fact that the Registrar of Trademarks have removed the said marks from the register on 12.04.2010. On 07.10.2010, the petitioner made an application for restoration of the said trademark on the register and renewal thereof. According to the petitioner, the respondent has not entertained this application. Consequently, this petition has been preferred.

4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent did not follow the prescrib

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top