SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd., In Re – Appellant
Versus
– Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manmohan J. The present petition has been filed under sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short "the Act") read with rule 46 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 (for short "the Rules, 1959") for confirming the reduction of share capital of the petitioner-company.

2. The relevant facts of the present case are that on July 5, 1951, the petitioner-company was incorporated as a public limited company under the name of M/s. Reckitt and Colman of India Ltd. On. December 18, 2000, the name of the petitioner-company was changed to M/s. Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd.

3. Between February 14, 2003 and May 19, 2005, the equity shares of the petitioner-company were delisted from Bombay, Calcutta and National Stock Exchanges in accordance with regulation 21(3)(a) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997. In fact, in view of the directions received from the said stock exchanges., M/s. Reckitt Benckiser Plc's subsidiary company, namely, Lancaster Square Holdings SL made an exit offer to acquire shares in the petitioner-company under the aforesaid Regulations.

4. Post delisting, the petitioner-c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top