SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sudesh Gupta – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (ORAL)

1. Vide order dated 1.11.2011 this case was listed for today as no one was present for the respondent on 1.11.2011. Today even in spite of passover, no one appears for the respondent. I have therefore perused the record and am proceeding to dispose of the appeal.

2. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is to the impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated 24.10.2009 by which the suit for specific performance filed by the respondent/plaintiff was decreed.

3. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the subject suit for specific performance alleging that the appellants/defendants had entered into an agreement to sell dated 18.12.1997 (Ex.PW2/3) with them for selling 18 bighas and 19 biswas of land situated in the revenue estate of village Mohammadpur Ramzanpur, Delhi. The area of 18 bighas and 19 biswas would translate to about nineteen thousand sq. yds. of land. The case of the respondent/plaintiff was that the total sale consideration was fixed at Rs.4,95,000/-. A sum of Rs.1,00,000/- was stated to have been paid in cash on the date of the agreement to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top