SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
INDERMEET KAUR
Parvinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Jain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Indermeet Kaur, J. (Oral)

CAV 188/2012

Caveator has put in appearance. Caveat has become infructuous. Dismissed.

CM(M) 223/2012 and CM Nos. 3236-3237/2012

1. Order impugned before this Court is the order dated 17.01.2012 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) which has endorsed the finding of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 01.06.2011 vide which the objections filed by the applicant Parvinder Kaur seeking setting aside of the eviction decree dated 13.08.2009 had been dismissed.

2. Certain facts are undisputed. The original tenant was Jagjit Singh; he had died on 17.02.2007; he had left behind one son Jaswinder Singh as also a widow and a married daughter. The eviction petition had been filed in the year 2009 arraying Jaswinder singh as a legal representative of the deceased Jagjit Singh; contention being that he was in occupation of the disputed shop after the death of his father; in fact Jaswinder Singh had also filed an application under Section 27 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA) seeking deposit of amount in lieu of premises which was stated to be under his tenancy. The application seeking leave to defend filed by the tenant Jaswinder Singh had bee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top