SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
ABB Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Suri – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (ORAL)

1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal (RFA) filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment of the trial Court dated 3.11.2003 by which the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for declaration and injunction for ownership with respect to 600 shares of the appellant-company was decreed. I may note that out of the total of 600 original shares which were in dispute, presently, the disputes only remains for 50 shares, inasmuch as, 500 shares were transferred to the respondent No.1/plaintiff during the pendency of this appeal and another 50 shares were transferred even prior to the institution of the suit.

2. The trial Court has decreed the suit by observing that the claim of respondent No.1/plaintiff with respect to the disputed shares was lodged in 1997 with the appellant/defendant No.1, but the appellant/defendant No.1 allowed the shares to be dematerialized and transferred much subsequently in the year 1999 and, therefore is liable to respondent No.1/plaintiff.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant, though at the outset, sought to urge that the trial Court by its order dated 24.11.1998 h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top