Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
A.K.SIKRI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Gurbachan Singh Thapar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. This Intra-Court Appeal impugns the judgment dated 28th November, 2005 of a Single Judge of this Court allowing W.P.(C) No. 16/1983 preferred by the respondent no.7 Shri Preetinder Singh Thapar, respondent no.8 Shri Hardeep Singh Thapar and respondent no.9 Smt. Narinder Kaur. The said respondents no.7,8&9 herein are hereafter referred to as the contesting respondents. The writ petition aforesaid was filed by the contesting respondents impugning the order dated 10th November, 1982 of the Dy. Secretary to the Government of India, Department of Rehabilitation with the delegated powers of the Central Government and the order dated 30th August, 1982 of the Dy. Chief Settlement Commissioner and for declaration that, in terms of the lease deed and conveyance deed executed by the President of India in their favour on 25th May, 1971, the contesting respondents were the owners/lessees to the extent of 3/4th share of property bearing No.A-78, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. The appellant herein was impleaded as respondent no.11 in the said writ petition.
2. It is deemed expedient to set out the history with respect to the aforesaid property. The said property
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
