SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Dentsply India Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Excel International – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (ORAL)

1. Issues are framed under Order 14 CPC. Issues are framed on material propositions of fact or law urged by one party and denied by the other. Framing of issues is considering the pleadings which are filed by the respective parties and also the other material on record. Consideration of the record at the time of framing issues prevents unnecessary issues from being framed and unnecessary evidence being led by both the parties, and, it also thus prevents unnecessary elongation of the case and prevents the record from becoming bulky. At the stage of framing of issues, Courts have to ensure that only those issues are framed which arise from the record of the case. If it is found that really the issue urged to be framed does not arise or the law bars the framing of the issue sought to be framed, then, such an issue need not be framed.

2. With this preface, let me set down the respective cases of the parties which are today being urged before me. The case of the plaintiff is simple. The plaintiff says that it deals with dental equipment and dental products. Plaintiff says that defendants were appointed by it as distributor of the goods of the pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top