SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VEENA BIRBAL
Nirmal – Appellant
Versus
Murari Lal Sharma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Veena Birbal, J.(ORAL)

CM No. 18205/2012 (exemption)

Exemption as prayed is allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

FAO No. 440/2012

1. By way of this appeal, a challenge has been made to the impugned order dated 30.08.2012 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi wherein the application of the appellants/plaintiffs under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed in a suit for declaration for consequential relief and permanent injunction against the respondents/defendants, has been dismissed.

2. The appellants herein are the plaintiffs before the learned trial court. They have filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction against respondents/defendants which is pending consideration before the learned trial court. Both the appellants are sisters of respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1. It is alleged that appellants/plaintiffs and respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1 and the LRs of their deceased brother namely, Om Prakash has inherited 1/4th share each in the property No. 620, measuring 140 sq. yds. within old Lal Dora of Village Jharoda Kalan, New Delhi from their parents. It is alleged that the afore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top