Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
D.C. Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. Ravindra Bhat, J. (OPEN COURT)
1. The petitioners, who were recruited and were serving with Indian Tibetan Border Police Force (hereinafter referred to as ITBPF) at the relevant time, are challenging the Recruitment Rules of 1999 and Standing Order No. 10/2000 dated 27th July, 2000 issued by the respondents on the ground that it has adversely affected the service conditions, especially chances of promotion.
2. Relevant facts for the purpose of this judgment are that the petitioners joined the ITBPF sometimes in 1970s. ITBPF was earlier a unit of Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and governed by the terms of its enactment. The separate enactment, the Indo Tibetan Police Force Act was brought into force in 1992 and the Rules including Rules of Recruitment were framed in 1994. The petitioners, as mentioned earlier, have been recruited to the ITBPF prior to coming into force of that enactment. In terms of the enactment and the Rules they were considered existing employees and assimilated in terms of the Rules as a part of the Force. The petitioners mentioned that certain service conditions had been formulated in 1984 and 1987 which had modified the existing system of
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
