SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Roxy Drycleaners – Appellant
Versus
Sameer Wason – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral)--By this petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short `the Act'), the petitioner/tenant impugns the judgment passed by the Additional Rent Controller on 31.10.2012, by which the Additional Rent Controller has decreed the bona fide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act by the respondents/landlords with respect to the tenanted premises being shop no. 53(new), Old Rajinder Nagar Market, New Delhi.

2. The facts which were pleaded by the respondents/landlords were that the tenanted shop/suit premises were required for the bona fide need of the respondent no.2 herein, and who was the petitioner no.2 before the Additional Rent Controller. The need which was pleaded was that the respondent no.2 does not have any other commercial premises in Delhi and he wants to start his own business in the suit/tenanted property. It was pleaded that the respondent no.1 herein, petitioner no.1 before the Additional Rent Controller and the co-landlord, was already carrying on his business from one other shop in the property in which the tenanted premises were situated, and therefore, the bona fide necessity

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top