DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Roxy Drycleaners – Appellant
Versus
Sameer Wason – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral)--By this petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short `the Act'), the petitioner/tenant impugns the judgment passed by the Additional Rent Controller on 31.10.2012, by which the Additional Rent Controller has decreed the bona fide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act by the respondents/landlords with respect to the tenanted premises being shop no. 53(new), Old Rajinder Nagar Market, New Delhi.
2. The facts which were pleaded by the respondents/landlords were that the tenanted shop/suit premises were required for the bona fide need of the respondent no.2 herein, and who was the petitioner no.2 before the Additional Rent Controller. The need which was pleaded was that the respondent no.2 does not have any other commercial premises in Delhi and he wants to start his own business in the suit/tenanted property. It was pleaded that the respondent no.1 herein, petitioner no.1 before the Additional Rent Controller and the co-landlord, was already carrying on his business from one other shop in the property in which the tenanted premises were situated, and therefore, the bona fide necessity
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.