SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ashutosh Kumar, J. The petitioner is the owner of Auto Rickshaw bearing no. DL 1RP 5127 (TSR) and holder of permit bearing no. DL 1 RP 5127. For violation of licence/permit rules, the vehicle of the petitioner was challaned on 28.06.2014. The petitioner appears to have been prosecuted for such violation of provisions of Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred as `MV Act') and was slapped with a fine of Rs.3,000/- by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate directed for release of the vehicle of the petitioner on payment of the aforesaid fine.

2. The vehicle of the petitioner, though, was released but the documents namely permit and registration papers were held back. The petitioner was handed over a show cause notice under Section 86 of the MV Act, 1988.

3. The notice under Section 86 of the MV Act reads as follows:

    NOTICE UNDER SECTION 86 OF M.V. ACT, 1988

    Whereas it has been reported that vehicle No.DL1RP5127 (TSR) plying under route No. Under State Permit/State Carriage Permit No.____________ valid upto ___________ committed traffic violation of permit violation was prosecuted vide challan No-25680057 on 28-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top