SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
HIMA KOHLI
Jeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dashrath Yadav – Respondent


ORDER

1. In the present four appeals, the appellant/plaintiff has assailed a common order dated 15.07.2015, passed by the learned trial court, allowing four separate applications filed by the respondents/defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and rejecting the plaints in all the four suits for possession instituted by him against the respondents/defendants, all residents of Khasra No. 36/23, 36/24, 36/17 and 38/18, Delhi, on the ground that the said suits are barred under Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act,1954 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act').

2. With the consent of the parties, RFA 815/2015 is treated as the lead matter and for the sake of convenience, the facts of the said appeal are being noticed.

3. In July, 2014, the appellant/plaintiff had instituted a suit for possession against the respondent/defendant, calling upon him to hand over vacant peaceful possession of a parcel of land measuring 67 sq. yards comprised in Khasra No.36/23 (4-16), situated in the revenue estate of village Rani Khera. The plaintiff has stated in the plaint that he is a "co-Bhumidar/owner" of the subject land; that Khasra No. 36/23 was acquired alongwith other landholdings belonging

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top