DELHI HIGH COURT
HIMA KOHLI
Jeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dashrath Yadav – Respondent
ORDER
1. In the present four appeals, the appellant/plaintiff has assailed a common order dated 15.07.2015, passed by the learned trial court, allowing four separate applications filed by the respondents/defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and rejecting the plaints in all the four suits for possession instituted by him against the respondents/defendants, all residents of Khasra No. 36/23, 36/24, 36/17 and 38/18, Delhi, on the ground that the said suits are barred under Section 185 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act,1954 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act').
2. With the consent of the parties, RFA 815/2015 is treated as the lead matter and for the sake of convenience, the facts of the said appeal are being noticed.
3. In July, 2014, the appellant/plaintiff had instituted a suit for possession against the respondent/defendant, calling upon him to hand over vacant peaceful possession of a parcel of land measuring 67 sq. yards comprised in Khasra No.36/23 (4-16), situated in the revenue estate of village Rani Khera. The plaintiff has stated in the plaint that he is a "co-Bhumidar/owner" of the subject land; that Khasra No. 36/23 was acquired alongwith other landholdings belonging
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.