SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Munna – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J. Vide impugned judgment dated 30.04.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Special Fast Track Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, Munna @ Rikas was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(e)/344/506 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') but acquitted for the offences punishable under Section 366/372/511/34 IPC whereas Suman Kumar was acquitted of charges under Sections 366/344/506(II)/372/511/34 IPC.

2. Munna @ Rikas preferred Crl. A. 957/2015 assailing his conviction for the aforesaid offences whereas the State has filed Crl. L.P. 20/2016 and sought leave to appeal against the acquittal of Munna @ Rikas and Suman Kumar.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 01.04.2011, on receipt of DD No. 31A, SI Mukesh Kumar and Constable Ishwar Singh found accused Suman Kumar at the traffic signal of Shastri Park, Delhi who informed them that accused Munna@Rikas had kept the prosecutrix in room C-13, 3rd Floor, DDA flats, Shastri Park, Delhi whereafter he accompanied them to the above said flat. On reaching there, they found the accused/respondent No. 1 and the prosecutrix. In her statement recorded by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top