Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
ICICI Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Gaurav – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment/order dated 24th April, 2015 by which the suit for recovery filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff bank (hereinafter, `Plaintiff bank') was dismissed. The judgement of the Trial Court dismisses the suit on the ground that the statements of accounts have not been duly proved under Section 65B of the India Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter, `Evidence Act').
2. In the appeal, notice was issued on 25th August, 2015. On the same date, a representative of the Plaintiff bank was appointed as a receiver. The receiver was directed to take over physical possession of the vehicle, and in case the Respondents/Defendants (hereinafter, `Defendants') were to pay the outstanding sum, the vehicle was to be released to them. The Receiver was directed to file his report within one week. The Defendants remained unserved as they had `left the given address', and steps were taken to serve them through publication. Service was finally recorded as having been completed by the order of the Registrar on 4th April, 2016. Despite service, the Defendants failed to appear. Thus, the appeal was admitted and listed in the cate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
