SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, DEEPA SHARMA
M. – Appellant
Versus
V.S. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Oral)--The present appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 assails the judgment and decree dated 19.01.20018, passed by the learned Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi, in HMA No.817/2017, titled as "V.S. vs. M.", whereby the petition for divorce instituted on behalf of the respondent/husband was decreed and the marriage between the parties was dissolved.

2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant at length and perused the Trial Court record, it is evident that the respondent/husband has been able to successfully establish the following circumstances against the appellant/wife:

    i. That the husband has been harassed and treated with cruelty by the wife by using derogatory language against him and his family members;

    ii. That the husband tried his best to bring back the wife from her parental home, but the latter was not agreeable to join him in her matrimonial home;

    iii. That the wife made various complaints against the husband and his family members inter alia, levelling serious allegations regarding having furnished false date of birth of husband, as well as, being involved in various criminal cases pendi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top