SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, P.S.TEJI
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Hargovind – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The State has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 15.09.2016 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.44750/2015 titled as State vs. Hargovind, arising out of FIR No.36/2013 registered under Section 363/366/376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act at Police Station Gokalpuri, Delhi, whereby the accused/respondent was acquitted from the charges leveled against him.

2. The facts in brief are that on 22.01.2013, complainant-PW4 lodged a complaint at Police Station Gokalpuri that his daughter, aged about 13 years, has been kidnapped by someone. On the basis of his complaint, the case was registered under Section 363 of IPC. Subsequently, on 27.02.2013, the victim was found present at the bus stop, Yamuna Vihar by the complainant and his uncle (phoofa) Prabhu Dayal. The accused Hargovind-`Chacha' of the prosecutrix was also present with her. The intimation in this regard was given to the Police Station and statement of the victim was recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. On the basis of the statement of the victim, penal Section 4 of the POCSO Act was added in the FIR. Subs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top