SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Sushil Maan – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Rana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral)--This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the Order XXXVII CPC suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 13.2.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant and decreed the suit filed on the basis of dishonoured cheque for a sum of Rs.6,00,000/-.

2. The case of the respondent/plaintiff was that the appellant/defendant was granted a friendly loan of Rs.6,00,000/- on 7.9.2015 and to secure which the appellant/defendant had issued a post dated Cheque No. 324347 drawn on Punjab National Bank, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi dated 7.9.2016. Respondent/plaintiff did not present the cheque for encashment on the request of the appellant/defendant but ultimately on account of non-payment of the dues the respondent/plaintiff issued the Legal Notice dated 2.2.2017 and thereafter filed the subject Order XXXVII suit.

3. In the leave to defend application it is not disputed by the appellant/defendant that he did take a loan of Rs.6,00,000/- from the respondent/plaintiff and also that the subject cheque was issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top