Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Viresh Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT) of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Petitioner impugns order dated 06.08.2013 limited to the extent that the said order discharges respondent No.10 - Dharmender, son of Ram Singh. The Trial Court has held that prima facie no charge is made out against respondent No.10 - Dharmender.
2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that Dharmender was very much involved in the assault on the petitioner/complainant and his family.
3. It may be noticed that the name of Dharmender does not figure in the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Dharmender was present. However, since the petitioner was dazed after the incident, he must have omitted the name of Dharmender while making a complaint. However, his name subsequently figures in a statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. given by the brother of the petitioner.
5. It is alleged in the FIR that an altercation had taken place with the petitioner wherein eight persons are alleged to have come into his house and assaulted the petitioner and his family members with sticks and rods.
6. Perusal of the FIR negates the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was dazed. Th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
