SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.RAVINDRA BHAT, A.K.CHAWLA
Tanishq Gangwar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. In these writ proceedings, the Petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the Regulations on Graduate Medical Education(Amendment), 2018 ("impugned amendment" hereafter) issued by notification dated 22.01.2018 by the Medical Council of India ("MCI" hereafter) with the previous approval of the Central Government (hereafter "UOI") as far as it prescribes that candidates who have cleared Biology/Biotechnology as an additional subject at 10+2 level after completing 10+2 without Biology/Biotechnology as a subject.

2. The impugned Regulations debarred all candidates who have passed 10+2 level with Biology/Biotechnology as an additional subject whether simultaneously or subsequently at 10+2 level. The Regulations were challenged by some students before this Court by W.P.(C) No. 1917 of 2018.During the course of hearing, the MCI, without further amending the impugned Regulations issued a clarification that the impugned Regulations does not apply to students who have studied biology/biotechnology as an additional subject simultaneously with other subjects at 10+2 level, however would debar students who had studied biology/biotechnology as additional subject subsequ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top