SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Parmila Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Saluja – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 19th December, 2017 in RCA No.137/2017 of the Court of Additional District Judge-04, South-West] of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellants/defendants against the judgment and decree [dated 29th August, 2017 in M No. 67/2016 of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge, South-West, Dwarka Courts] allowing the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of possession of property no. C-11, Second Floor, Jeevan Park, Pankha Road, New Delhi from the appellants/defendants.

2. This appeal came up before this Court first on 9th February, 2018 and has thereafter been adjourned from time to time without the aspect of admissibility thereof being considered.

3. The sine qua non for entertaining a Second Appeal being that it should raise a substantial question of law, the counsel for the appellants/defendants has been heard and the copies of the Suit Court Record and the First Appellate Court record annexed to the memorandum of appeal perused.

4. The counsel for the appellants/defendants has argued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top