SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Deepak Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

Crl.M.A.32909/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.REV.P. 832/2018 & Crl.M.A.32908/2018 (stay)

1. The petitioner impugns orders dated 06.08.2018 and 05.09.2018, wherein, the Trial Court has recorded the testimony of the prosecution witnesses Pratima and Nand Lal respectively and thereafter discharged them.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that sufficient opportunity was not given to the counsel for the defence to be ready for the cross-examination of the said witnesses.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken me through the record, inter alia the orders dated 16.10.2017, 30.11.2017, 23.12.2017, 08.02.2018, 15.03.2018, 12.04.2018, 10.05.2018, 30.05.2018 and 06.08.2018, which, inter alia, show that the matter was being adjourned from time to time for examination and cross-examination of Nand Lal and the same was being deferred for want of the FSL report. Orders dated 12.04.2018, 10.05.2018 and 30.05.2018 further show that the matter was adjourned for securing the presence of PW12 Pratima.

4. Perusal of order dated 06.08.2018 shows that PW12 Pratima was present in Court, examined and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top