Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Vinod - Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2684 of 2018
Decided On : 16-11-2018
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of four weeks in FIR No.106/2018 under Section 21 NDPS Act, Police Station Crime Branch on the ground that his brother-in-law (wife's brother) has expired on 04.11.2018 and the last rituals are to be performed on 17.11.2018 and thereafter within next 3-4 days Dharam Shant has to be performed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some rituals need to be performed in Kurukshetra also.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier also granted interim bail for a period of 7 days on account of illness of his daughter and he had duly surrendered in terms of the orders of the Court.
3. Status report has been filed which has verified the factum of the death as also the factum of performing of last rituals.
4. Learned APP for the State submits that since the deceased is his brother-in-law, the last rituals at Kurukshetra would be performed by his family members and the petitioner would not be necessary for the same.
5. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner was also granted interim bail and had duly surrendered thereafter, I am inclined to grant interim bail to the petitioner for a period of 1 week from the date of his release.
6. Accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, petitioner shall be released on interim bail for a period of 1 week from the date of his release. Petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. Petitioner shall not leave Delhi during this period. Petitioner shall duly surrender to the concerned Superintendent Jail on the expiry of 1 week of his release.
7. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
