SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
H.S. Bedi (Retd) – Appellant
Versus
STCI Finance Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)--This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act') has been filed by the petitioners challenging the Arbitral Award dated 14.09.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Loan Agreement dated 28.09.2013 executed between the parties.

2. The limited ground of challenge to the Arbitral Award is on the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal. It is contended by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the Sole Arbitrator was not appointed in accordance with the Arbitration Agreement between the parties and therefore, all proceedings conducted by him culminating in the Impugned Award are a nullity. He has placed reliance on the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Dharma Prathishthanam v. Madhok Construction (P) Ltd., (2005) 9 SCC 686 in support of this contention. The learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the Arbitration Agreement between the parties required the disputes to be referred to a Sole Arbitrator and in case of any disagreement between the parties on the appointment of the Sole A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top