SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
S.MURALIDHAR, SANJEEV NARULA
Rajvir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. The Petitioner who has been compulsorily retired from service has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the orders passed by the Disciplinary and Appellate Authority of the Railway Protection Force (Respondents).

Factual Background

2. The Petitioner was recruited as Sub-Inspector in Railway Protection Special Force on 20th March, 1979. He was promoted to the rank of Inspector, Grade-II on 6th May, 1991 and was posted at Ferozpur. It is the stand of the Petitioner, that at that time, he fell ill with pain in his gall bladder and was admitted to the Railway Hospital, Ferozpur. He was diagnosed with gall bladder stones and was referred to the Northern Railway Hospital, New Delhi, where he was advised to undergo surgery for the aforesaid illness. The Petitioner was hesitant to undergo surgery and opted for Ayurvedic and Unani treatment.

3. The aforesaid modes of treatment being time consuming, the Petitioner accordingly filed an application dated 18th April, 1992, seeking sanction of 75 days leave w.e.f. 25th April, 1992. This request was accepted vide order dated 14th May, 1992, and accordingly he was s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top