SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUNIL GAUR
Kuldeep Maurya – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

1. In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.605/2015, whereas in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.604/2015, both under Sections 354A/323 of IPC, registered at police station Dabri, Delhi is sought. Both the FIRs pertain to one incident. Quashing of these FIRs is sought on the ground that misunderstanding which led to this incident, now stands cleared between the parties in terms of Mediated Settlement of 6th June, 2018 (Annexure P-3).

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

3. Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State, accepts notice of these two petitions and submits that Ms. Neetu Pandey is the complainant in FIR No.605/2015 and Ms.Neeru Maurya, is the complainant in FIR No.604/2015 and they have been duly identified to be so by ASI Ombir, Investigating Officer of this case as well as their counsel.

4. Complainants of these FIRs submit that the misunderstanding, which led to registration of these FIRs, now stands cleared. They submit that both the sides are neighbours and to restore harmon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top