SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Geeta Arora – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.(Oral)--Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of two months in case FIR No. 104/2014 under Sections 363/366/328/366-A/342/370/370A/372/373/376/34/120-B of the IPC and Sections 4/6/10/17 POCSO Act and Sections 3/4/5/6 ITP Act, Police Station Najafgarh.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge against the petitioner has been framed under Sections 363/366/328/366-A/342/370/370A/372/373/376/34/120-B of the IPC and Sections 3/4/5/6 ITP Act.

3. Petitioner seeks interim bail on the ground that petitioner is a suspected case of Cancer and it was so suspected in the Cancer Medical Camp which was held in jail in March 2019.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the petitioner being on medication/treatment in jail, there is no improvement in her condition and jail authorities for about three months has not been able to determine conclusively as to whether the petitioner actually suffers from Cancer or not.

5. Several reports have been received from the jail authorities. The medical report indicates that in her cytopathology report ASCUS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance) was found and she w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top