SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Mayank Singhvi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - Point 1 (!) (!) (!) - Point 2 (!) (!) (!) - Point 3 (!) (!) (!)

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?


JUDGMENT

Crl.M.A. 656/2019 in BAIL APPLN.3003/2018

1. In this Bail Application the petitioner has preferred the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for placing on record additional documents some of which do not form part of charge-sheet but were provided to the petitioner on his application filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C. before the learned Trial Court. The documents primarily sought to be placed and relied upon vide this application which are not part of the chargesheet are the messages generated from the clone of the mobile phones deposited with the FSL, clone copy of which the petitioner has received pursuant to the order of the learned Trial Court on an application filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C. It is the case of the petitioner that the deceased was under depression due to her hectic work life style which fact was acknowledged by her mother and was undergoing treatment from a Doctor in Chandigarh. Further the allegations of cruelty are baseless. There was no demand of dowry ever and quarrels between the spouses were also due to provocation. The petitioner seeks to place on record some of the copies of the whatsapp transcriptions between R.S. Batra and the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top