SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Kapil Nagar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.(Oral)--Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.74/2019 under Section 306 IPC, Police Station Khajuri Khas.

2. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the brother of the deceased. It is alleged that there was a dispute between the co- accused and the family of the deceased. FIR alleges that the co- accused Tushar Bansal, his father Pushpender Bansal and the petitioner were troubling the family of the deceased including the deceased. It is alleged that there was a monetary transaction between the family of the deceased and Pushpender Bansal and they used to fight with them. It is alleged that the petitioner along with Pushpender Bansal illegally showed that substantial amount of money was due from the complainant and his family. Subsequently, a settlement was arrived at with the intervention of some people. Pursuant to the settlement, one plot was transferred by the father of the deceased in the name of the mother of Tushar Bansal. Further, it is alleged that despite that they were not satisfied and they continued to harass and trouble the deceased. A complaint was made in August 2018.

3. The case of the prosecution is that in December 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top