Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Caparo Maruti Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M.D. Jindal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J.
I.A No. 2486/2018 in CS (OS) No. 645/2007
1. By way of this application, the Applicants Machino Plastics Ltd.[Plaintiff No. 1 in the CS (OS) No. 645/2007 and Defendant No. 1 in CS (OS) No. 761/2005] and Mr. Sanjiv Jindal [Defendant No.4 in the CS (OS) No.761/2005] under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 seeks consolidation of the following suits:
a. CS (OS) No. 756/2005 titled as "Caparo Maruti Ltd. v. M.D Jindal"
b. CS(OS) No. 757/2005 titled as "M/S Caparo Maruti Ltd. v. Surya Kant Aggarwal & Ors"
c. CS (OS) No. 761/2005 titled as "Caparo Maruti Ltd. v. Machine Plastics Ltd. and Ors"
d. CS (OS) No. 645/2007 titled as "Machino Plastics Pvt. Ltd. &Ors. V. Caparo Maruti Ltd. & Ors."
2. It is pertinent to note that earlier this Court vide order dated 09th November 2017 allowed the Transfer Petition, being No. TR.P.(C) 41/2017, filed by Machino Plastics Ltd., Machino Finance Pvt. Ltd., Mr. M.D. Jindal and Mr. Surya Kant Aggarwal, and transferred the aforementioned three Suits [CS (OS) No. 756/2005;CS (OS) No. 761/2005; CS (OS) No. 645/2007] from the District Court at Saket, Delhi to this Court so that all the said three suits could be heard
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
