SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Angad Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vipin Sanghi, J.(Oral)--The three petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the communications dated 30.01.2014, 15.04.2014 and 10.09.2014 issued by respondent No. 2 rejecting their claim for appointment to the post of Head Constable (Ministerial), in short HC (M) through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE). The petitioners also seek a mandamus to the respondents to consider them for appointment to the said post of HC (M) on the basis of their participation in the LDCE recruitment process 2012-13.

2. The case of the petitioners is that at the relevant time the petitioners were serving the CRPF as Constable (GD). The Government notified the Central Reserve Police Force (Combatised Group-C the Ministerial Posts), Recruitment Rules (RRs)-2010 on 27.01.2011. These rules, inter alia, provided the method of recruitment for the post of HC (M). Under these rules, 70% posts of HC (M) were to be filled through direct recruitment, and the remaining 30% by departmental examination from amongst officers of Central Reserve Police Force having three years regular service in the grade of Constable of all categories including tradesmen/technician and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top