SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Facebook Inc – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Malik – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)

CM APPL. 38450/2019 (for exemption) in CM(M) 1263/2019

CM APPL. 38535/2019 (for exemption) in CM(M) 1267/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of.

CM(M) 1263/2019 & CM APPL. 38449/2019 (for stay) CM(M) 1267/2019 & 38534/2019

2. The Plaintiff/Respondent - Mr. Surinder Malik (hereinafter `Plaintiff') had filed the suit for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark and passing off, and under Section 74 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter, `IT Act') seeking protection of the trademark `DA MILANO'. The Plaintiff claims to be the owner of the mark `DA MILANO' in various forms including in label and logo forms. Defendants No.1 to 4 in the suit are alleged infringers who have put posts on the Facebook and Instagram platforms advertising and offering to sell products bearing the mark `DA MILANO'. The Plaintiff sought a permanent injunction against the alleged infringers and impleaded Facebook Inc. and Instagram LLC as Defendants No.5 and 6 so as to ensure that the posts containing the infringing marks are taken down.

3. The Defendants 5 and 6 do not dispute the rights of the Pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top