Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Jasdan Energy Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Inox Wind Limited - Respondent
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 433 of 2019
Decided On : 06-11-2019
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's acknowledgment of proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. extension of arbitration proceedings (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. request for additional time in arbitration (Para 5) |
| 4. petition allowance and order (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J.(Oral)
I.A. No. 15473/2019 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 433/2019
1. Issue notice.
2. Ms. Ashna Abrol, Advocate enters appearance on behalf of respondent and accepts notice.
3. This is a joint petition under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of Award.
4. On 28.5.2017, Arbitral Tribunal had entered upon reference. Thereafter, time has been extended from time to time by mutual consent of the parties as well as through various orders passed by this Court.
5. Learned counsels for the parties submit that final arguments have commenced and respondent's arguments are underway. The petition has been filed seeking further extension of six months from 9.11.2019 for completion of proceedings.
6. With the consent of the parties, time for completion of the proceedings and passing of the Award is extended by a period of six months, with effect from 9.11.2019.
7. Petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
