SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
BRIJESH SETHI
Varun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of anticipatory bail application. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's claim of innocence and relationship dynamics. (Para 2 , 3)
3. state's allegations against petitioner. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
4. legal standards distinguishing rape from consensual sex. (Para 8)
5. denial of anticipatory bail due to serious allegations. (Para 9)

JUDGMENT

Brijesh Sethi, J.(Oral)--Vide this order, I shall dispose of anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner Varun Kumar under section 438 Cr.P.C in FIR No. 1144/18, PS. Aman Vihar, U/s. 376 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for anticipatory bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated. The false allegations of sexual assault have been leveled against the petitioner by the complainant though she has established relations with the petitioner on her own free will. However, in the course of time, due to unstable behavior of the complainant, the petitioner ended the relationship and for this reason, the complainant has registered the present FIR which is false and fabricated.

3. It is submitted that petitioner has never promised the complainant for marriage. In fact it was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top