Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
HIMA KOHLI, ASHA MENON
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University – Appellant
Versus
Naincy Sagar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion criteria and course structure (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. reasons for student detention (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding interpretation of clauses (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. framework of attendance and credits requirements (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. understanding academic breaks and attendance (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. attendance stipulations and their implications (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. statutory interpretation principles (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. significance of attendance in professional courses (Para 26 , 27) |
| 9. educational integrity and legal degree standards (Para 30 , 31) |
| 10. court’s final order and conclusion (Para 32) |
JUDGMENT
Hima Kohli, J. The appellant, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (in short `GGSIPU') has filed the present appeal being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 31.10.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge, allowing two writ petitions, one filed by Naincy Sagar [W.P. (C) 10909/2019] and the other by Prateek Solanki [W.P. (C) 8697/2019], both enrolled in the B.A. LL.B/B.B.A.LL.B five years integrated course offered by the respondent No.2/Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (in short `VIPS'), with a common prayer that they be promoted to the next
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
