Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Mahmood Asad Madani – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash fir and related proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. guidelines regarding anonymous complaints. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's rights regarding travel allowances. (Para 6 , 8 , 13) |
| 4. claims submission process and responsibilities. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. cbi's case against petitioner based on allegations of forgery. (Para 15 , 19) |
| 6. respondent's claims regarding excessive travel reimbursement. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. mens rea crucial for establishing the offense. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. fir quashed due to lack of criminality or intent. (Para 38) |
| 9. imposition of costs and directives post-order. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 10. final disposition of applications due to judgment. (Para 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the FIR dated 12.06.2014 being No. RC-08 (A), 2014/CBI/AC-III/New Delhi and subsequent proceedings emanating out of the said FIR pending for trial for the offences punishable under section 120-B read with 420/467/468/471 IPC and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
2. In the present case, FIR was registered on 12.06.2014 and on the same day, CBI registered s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
