SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Badri Singh Vinimay Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
MMTC Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disputes from tender and arbitration initiation (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. grounds for challenging arbitration proceedings (Para 5 , 6)
3. importance of notice per section 21 of the act (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. compliance with ica rules and section 21 (Para 14 , 15 , 19)
5. rejection of petition under section 34 (Para 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

1. By way of this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"], the petitioner seeks setting aside of an award dated 02.12.2014 passed by a sole arbitrator. By the impugned award, the respondent herein was awarded a sum of Rs.1,12,27,431/- alongwith interest and costs of the arbitration proceedings.

Facts

2. The disputes between the parties arise out of a tender floated by the respondent for sale of 1500 metric tonnes ("MT") of imported lentils (toor lemon-Myanmar origin). The petitioner's bid for purchase of 250 MT of the goods @ Rs.42,810/- per MT was accepted. The respondent contended that the petitioner had failed to lift the goods, as a result of which it was compelled to sell the material to third parties at the risk and cost of the petitioner.

3. In terms of the agreem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top