SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Shamsi Azmi - Appellant
Versus
Saher Khan - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 5539 of 2019 with Crl.M.A. 39257 of 2019
Decided On : 13-01-2020




Maintenance claims under Section 125 require established dependency; the maintainability of claims must be assessed prima facie before income disclosures are compelled.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 125 and Section 127 - Maintenance - Petitioner directed to file income affidavit; challenges basis of daughter's claim under Section 125 - Compromise reached in prior proceedings for maintenance - Monthly maintenance of Rs.8,000/- established and paid regularly - Terms included a lump sum settlement for future needs - Respondent proposed unilateral adjustment for future maintenance amount which petitioner agreed to during court proceedings. (Paras 1, 2, 6, 10, 11)

(B) Principle - Maintainability and interim maintenance - Major daughter’s ability to claim maintenance is subject to prima facie assessment of her needs under Section 125(1)(c) - Court emphasizes the need to establish grounds for maintenance before directing income disclosures. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is the father of the respondent, having divorced the first wife post the birth of respondent. Following proceedings, a lump sum arrangement was established for maintenance. A petition was filed by the respondent seeking further maintenance adjustments.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed the previous MOU on maintenance payments and settled a new figure of Rs.30 lakhs for all future claims regarding maintenance and educational expenses. The agreement was made binding.

Issues: The core issues involve evaluating the applicability of Section 125 regarding maintenance claims from the respondent, aged beyond the minor threshold.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the maintainability of the daughter’s claim must be assessed, and requests for income information must be justified under the framework of Section 125(1)(c) to ascertain dependency on the father.

Result: Petition disposed of as settled with establishment of maintenance agreement.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to set aside prior directions. (Para 1)
2. background on petitioner, respondent, and agreements. (Para 2 , 6)
3. petitioner seeks quashing based on settlement. (Para 3 , 4)
4. memorandum deemed order under section 125 cr.p.c. (Para 5)
5. argument on maintainability before interim maintenance. (Para 8)
6. court's interaction and understanding of parties' positions. (Para 9 , 10)
7. agreement on maintenance amount for the respondent. (Para 11)
8. court's binding clarification and conclusion. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present, petitioner seeks directions thereby to set aside directions dated 30.09.2019, whereby the petitioner has been directed to file his income affidavit in a sealed envelope. The petitioner further prays for necessary directions to the learned trial Court that the maintainability of the case bearing MT No. 208/2018 titled as `Sheba Khan and Ors. Vs. Shamsi Azmi and Ors.' be decided first before proceeding further in the case.

2. The petitioner herein is the father and the respondent is his daughter from his first wife. The petitioner married Ms. Sheba Khan (first wife) on 01.03.1996. They were blessed with a girl child, respondent herein, on 19.02.1997. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner and his wife, the petitioner divorced her by pronouncing triple talaq on 19.11.1997. Thereafter, on 24.04.2003, the first wife filed petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance for her as well on behalf of respondent (Saher Khan) before the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. The said Court was pleased to direct the petitioner herein to pay Rs.8,000/- P.M. to Ms. Sheba Khan for the maintenance towards respondent herein. In the meanwhile, Ms. Sheba Khan, petitioner's first wife also got registered an FIR bearing no. 126/2003, under Section 498A/406 IPC, against the petitioner and his relatives, with Police Station - Tilak Marg. Afterwards, with the intervention of friends, relatives and well wishers of petitioner and Ms. Sheba Khan, a compromise was arrived between them and in furtherance of which Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed by them on 29.05.2005. The respondent, at that point of time, was a minor, aged 8 years and was being represented by her natural guardian, Ms. Sheba Khan. The MOU contains detailed terms and conditions with respect to alimony of Ms. Sheba Khan, maintenance to be paid to respondent and rights and liabilities of Ms. Sheba Khan towards the respondent. The terms and conditions relevant to the context of rights and liabilities of petitioner in regard to maintenance to be paid to respondent are as follows:

"That the party no.1 has agreed to pay a lump sum amount of Rs.12 lacs to party no.2. Six lacs for Sheba &the other six lacs for the minor daughter with liberty to Sheba to use this money as per her wishes without any hindrance whatsoever. However in case at the time of attaining majority Saher repudiates the present agreement, Sheba, would be liable to repay the amount of six lacs along with the benefits to Miss Sehar. The said amount is being paid to Saher in a lump sum in full and final settlement of her entire claims of maintenance (past, present, future) including schooling, higher studies, and marriage expenses etc and of any other kind against the party of the First Part and/or his relatives. In case Sheba Khan purchases any flat/property from the alimony of Rs.12 lacs or any part thereof the same would be purchased jointly in the name of Miss. Saher and Sheba Khan.

That the party no.1 also has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.8,000/- per month to Saher for the maintenance till she attains the age of 21 years or till she gets married whichever is earlier. Which as per the orders of the court is being deposited in the account of Sheba Khan for the same. Sheba Khan would also contribute her share of 1/3rd of maintenance i.e., Rs.4000/- per month for the welfare of Saher fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top