SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Hardeep Kaur Gill – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts of the case regarding possession of cartridges. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. competing legal interpretations of ammunition under the arms act. (Para 10 , 11)
3. judicial distinction between minor ammunition and serious offenses. (Para 12)
4. analysis of lack of threat in the present case. (Para 13 , 14)
5. final ruling to quash fir due to absence of intent. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT(Oral)

CRL. M.A. 43553/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6715/2019

3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 86/2017 registered at Police Station - IGI Airport, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 25/54/59 Arms Act, 1959 and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

4. The present petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by stating that the petitioner is a qualified NRI and holder of Canadian Passport bearing No.HK861021, belongs to an educated and reputed family and is a married lady, having minor children, who came to India to meet her relatives in Punjab.

5. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was travelling back to Canada from Delhi via Zurich by Swi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top