Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Ravinder – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction of appellant under ipc and pocso act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense arguments about age and stalking (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. testimony and age of prosecutrix consistent (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. eyewitness and police corroboration of events (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. injury classification and prosecution burden (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. establishment of guilt under modified charges (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. final sentencing adjustments (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
Anu Malhotra, J. The appellant Ravinder @ Shati s/o Sh. Dhanpal vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 11.07.2019 of the learned ASJ-01 (POCSO) South East, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi whereby the appellant was convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The appellant has also assailed the impugned order on sentence dated 17.07.2019 of the learned Trial Court whereby on conviction vide the impugned judgment date 11.07.2019, the appellant was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three (3) years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- qua the offence punishable under Section 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
